Webb5 juni 2024 · The poverty of stimulus is one of the interesting arguments from Plato’s problem. The argument is “How do we come to have such rich and specific knowledge, or such intricate systems of belief and understanding when the evidence available to us is so meager?” (Chomsky 1987: 33). Webb1980年,乔姆斯基在《Rules and Representation》(Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 1-15, 42-61)中,首次使用了“刺激贫乏 ”(poverty of stimulus)这个术语。 他指出:“极其 贫乏的语言环境”(highly impoverished)的语言环境与“极其具体和复杂”(highly specific and intricate)的语言知识系统之间存在着巨大的差别。
Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited - Berwick - Wiley Online Library
WebbVarious “poverty of stimulus” (POS) arguments suggest that these invariances reflect an innate human endowment, as opposed to common experience: Such experience warrants selection of the grammars acquired only if humans assume, a priori, that selectable grammars respect substantive constraints. WebbThe Poverty of Stimulus and Structure Dependence in Auxiliary Fronting. Children only hear a finite number of sentences, yet they learn to speak and comprehend sentences drawn from a language that can contain an infinite number of sentences. The poverty of stimulus argument suggests that children do 1131 simply sam organization
Reaffirming the poverty of the stimulus argument: a reply to the ...
WebbTHE POVERTY OF THE STIMULUS ARGUMENT ONCE AGAIN. Liza Skidelsky, S. Barberis, A. Barceló. Published 2024. Philosophy. The best-known argument in favor of the innatism … Webb12 nov. 2005 · The poverty of stimulus argument is one of the most controversial arguments in the study of language acquisition. Here we follow previous approaches challenging the assumption of impoverished primary linguistic data, focusing on the specific problem of auxiliary (AUX) fronting in complex polar interrogatives. WebbDas Poverty-of-the-Stimulus-Argument (POSA) (dt. in etwa „Argument von der Armut der Reize“) besagt, dass vieles von dem, was im menschlichen Geist ist, zu komplex und zu vielfältig sei, als dass es (im Lauf des Lebens) von außen hinein gekommen sein kann. Das Argument wird von Nativisten häufig zur Stützung ihrer Position verwendet. simply sandje youtube